Traditional Hard Drives VS Solid-State Drives
What is a Solid State Drive?
Solid-state drives (SSD) were commercially showcased in 2007 at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas, Nevada. These drives, like traditional hard drives, are data storage devices. Unlike hard drives, however, SSDs use semiconductor technology rather than electromechanical components which means there are no moving parts to the drive and therefore run silently. The lack of moving parts also nearly eliminates the possibility of mechanical failure.
The backbone of the SSD is its design, using essentially the same technology as the USB flash drive and other NAND Flash non-volatile devices including Compact Flash cards. As previously mentioned, there are no moving parts, and this creates extremely fast access to the data contained in the drive. Without the need to spool the drive or move the read/write head, seek-times are typically orders of magnitude lower which in turn dramatically improve random access read times.
Comparisons: Which Drive is Best For You?
The choice of which storage medium to use is an important one. Ideally, you need to weight the pros and cons and consider which solution is right for you. A dedicated server environment is significantly different from a desktop environment, so keeping that in mind is necessary.
- Faster start-up, as no spin-up is required.
- Typically, fast random access for reading, as there is no read/write head to move.
- Extremely low read latency times, as SSD seek-times are orders of magnitude lower than the best current hard disk drives.
- In applications where hard disk seeks are the limiting factor, this results in faster boot and application launch times.
- For low-capacity flash SSDs, low power consumption and heat production when in active use, although high-end SSDs and DRAM-based SSDs may have significantly higher power requirements.
- High mechanical reliability.
- Ability to endure extreme shock, high altitude, vibration and extremes of temperature, etc.
- Relatively deterministic read performance: unlike hard disk drives, performance of SSDs is almost constant and deterministic across the entire storage. This is because the seek time is almost constant and does not depend on the physical location of the data, and so, file fragmentation has almost no impact on read performance.
- For low-capacity SSDs, lower weight and size: although size and weight per unit storage are still better for traditional hard drives. When failures occur, they tend to occur either ‘on write’, or ‘on erase’, rather than ‘on read’. With traditional HDDs, failure tends to occur ‘on read’. If the drive detects failure on write, data can be written to a new cell without data loss occuring. If a drive fails on read, then data is usually lost permanently.
- As of Q1-2009, SSD prices are still considerably higher per-gigabyte than traditional HDDs. Consumer grade drives are typically USD 1.75 to 3.25 per GB for flash drives and over USD 75 per GB for RAM-based compared to less than USD 0.13 per gigabyte for hard drives.
- Currently, the maximum capacity is far lower than that of conventional hard drives, though .
- DRAM based SSDs have a higher vulnerability to abrupt power loss.
- Limited write (erase) cycles – flash-memory cells will often wear out after 1,000 to 10,000 write cycles for MLC, and up to 100,000 write cycles for SLC.
- Slower write speeds – as erase blocks on flash-based SSDs generally are quite large (e.g. 0.5 – 1 megabyte), they are far slower than conventional disks for random writes and therefore vulnerable to write fragmentation, and in some cases for sequential writes. SSDs based on DRAM do not suffer from this problem.
- Lower storage density – hard disks can store more data per unit volume than DRAM or flash SSDs, except for very low capacity/small devices.
What About Server Performance?
Generally, SSDs of similar quality tend to out-perform their HDD counterparts in dedicated server operations as is shown in the graphs below. The difference is staggering and it’s not uncommon to see performance gains of more than double. Super Talent MasterDrive MX, Samsung FlashSSD, and OCZ SATA II are the SSD drives in this scenario.
As you can see, the OCZ and Samsung SSDs easily outperform even the best of drives, while the MasterDrive holds its own against the big opponents in most benchmarks, even going so far as to more than tripling its performance in the web server setup — a read-only arrangement.
When it comes to read operations, SSD is the clear winner. It’s important to take into account the behavior of your environment before deciding on your storage device. Will your server primarily be a read-intensive web server or a heavy-write database-driven application? These are questions you should ask yourself.
While the cost of SSD server storage is higher, the performance benefit of faster read times can be a boon to those seeking a more responsive dedicated machine.
Coupled with the increased mechanical reliability and faster server reboot times, this may just be the solution you need.